Colorado Relocation Statute

Please check state case law as standards for relocation may be
found in case law.
C.R.S.
14-10-129
14-10-129. Modification of parenting time
(1) (a)
(I) Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (I) of paragraph (b) of this
subsection (1), the court may make or modify an order granting or denying
parenting time rights whenever such order or modification would serve the best
interests of the child.
(II)
In
those cases in which a party with whom the child resides a majority of the time
is seeking to relocate with the child to a residence that substantially changes
the geographical ties between the child and the other party, the court, in
determining whether the modification of parenting time is in the best interests
of the child, shall take into account all relevant factors, including those
enumerated in paragraph (c) of subsection (2) of this section. The party who is
intending to relocate with the child to a residence that substantially changes
the geographical ties between the child and the other party shall provide the
other party with written notice as soon as practicable of his or her intent to
relocate, the location where the party intends to reside, the reason for the
relocation, and a proposed revised parenting time plan. A court hearing on any
modification of parenting time due to an intent to relocate shall be given a
priority on the court's docket.
(b)
(I)
The
court shall not restrict a parent's parenting time rights unless it finds that
the parenting time would endanger the child's physical health or significantly
impair the child's emotional development. In addition to a finding that
parenting time would endanger the child's physical health or significantly
impair the child's emotional development, in any order imposing or continuing a
parenting time restriction, the court shall enumerate the specific factual
findings supporting the restriction. Nothing in this section shall be construed
to affect grandparent or great-grandparent visitation granted pursuant to
section 19-1-117, C.R.S.
(II) The
provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (b) shall not apply in those
cases in which a party with whom the child resides a majority of the time is
intending to relocate with the child to a residence that substantially changes
the geographical ties between the child and the other party.
(1.5) If
a motion for a substantial modification of parenting time which also changes the
party with whom the child resides a majority of the time has been filed, whether
or not it has been granted, no subsequent motion may be filed within two years
after disposition of the prior motion unless the court decides, on the basis of
affidavits, that the child's present environment may endanger the child's
physical health or significantly impair the child's emotional development or
that the party with whom the child resides a majority of the time is intending
to relocate with the child to a residence that substantially changes the
geographical ties between the child and the other party.
(2)
The
court shall not modify a prior order concerning parenting time that
substantially changes the parenting time as well as changes the party with whom
the child resides a majority of the time unless it finds, upon the basis of
facts that have arisen since the prior decree or that were unknown to the court
at the time of the prior decree, that a change has occurred in the circumstances
of the child or the party with whom the child resides the majority of the time
and that the modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child.
In applying these standards, the court shall retain the parenting time schedule
established in the prior decree unless:
(a)
The
parties agree to the modification; or
(b)
The
child has been integrated into the family of the moving party with the consent
of the other party; or
(c)
The
party with whom the child resides a majority of the time is intending to
relocate with the child to a residence that substantially changes the
geographical ties between the child and the other party. A court hearing on any
modification of parenting time due to an intent to relocate shall be given a
priority on the court's docket. In determining whether the modification of
parenting time is in the best interests of the child, the court shall take into
account all relevant factors, including whether a party has committed an act of
domestic violence, has engaged in a pattern of domestic violence, or has a
history of domestic violence, as that term is defined in section 14-10-124
(1.3), which factor shall be supported by a preponderance of the evidence, and
shall consider such domestic violence whether it occurred before or after the
prior decree, and all other factors enumerated in section 14-10-124 (1.5)(a)
and:
(I)
The
reasons why the party wishes to relocate with the child;
(II) The
reasons why the opposing party is objecting to the proposed relocation;
(III)
The
history and quality of each party's relationship with the child since any
previous parenting time order;
(IV) The
educational opportunities for the child at the existing location and at the
proposed new location;
(V) The
presence or absence of extended family at the existing location and at the
proposed new location;
(VI)
Any
advantages of the child remaining with the primary caregiver;
(VII)
The
anticipated impact of the move on the child;
(VIII) Whether
the court will be able to fashion a reasonable parenting time schedule if the
change requested is permitted; and
(IX)
Any
other relevant factors bearing on the best interests of the child; or
(d) The
child's present environment endangers the child's physical health or
significantly impairs the child's emotional development and the harm likely to
be caused by a change of environment is outweighed by the advantage of a change
to the child.
(2.5) (a)
When the court restricts a party's parenting time pursuant to section
19-5-105.5, C.R.S., or section 19-5-105.7, C.R.S., or section 14-10-124 (4)(a)(IV),
the court may make or modify an order granting or denying parenting time rights
whenever such order or modification would serve the best interests of the child.
Within thirty-five days after the filing of a verified motion by the restricted
party seeking a modification of parenting time, the court shall determine from
the verified motion, and response to the motion, if any, whether there has been
a substantial and continuing change of circumstances such that the current
parenting time orders are no longer in the child's best interests, including
consideration of whether the restricted parent has satisfactorily complied with
any conditions set forth by the court when the court imposed the restrictions on
parenting time, and either:
(I)
Deny the motion, if there is an inadequate allegation; or
(II)
Set
the matter for hearing as expeditiously as possible with notice to the parties
of the time and place of the hearing.
(b) If
the court finds that the filing of a motion under paragraph (a) of this
subsection (2.5) was substantially frivolous, substantially groundless,
substantially vexatious, or intended to harass or intimidate the other party,
the court shall require the moving party to pay the reasonable and necessary
attorney fees and costs of the other party.
(3)
(a)
If a parent has been convicted of any of the crimes listed in paragraph (b) of
this subsection (3) or convicted in another state or jurisdiction, including but
not limited to a military or federal jurisdiction, of an offense that, if
committed in Colorado, would constitute any of the crimes listed in paragraph
(b) of this subsection (3), or convicted of any crime in which the underlying
factual basis has been found by the court on the record to include an act of
domestic violence, as defined in section 18-6-800.3 (1), C.R.S., that
constitutes a potential threat or endangerment to the child, the other parent,
or any other person who has been granted custody of or parental responsibility
for the child pursuant to court order may file an objection to parenting time
with the court. The other parent or other person having custody or parental
responsibility shall give notice to the offending parent of such objection as
provided by the Colorado rules of civil procedure, and the offending parent
shall have twenty-one days from such notice to respond. If the offending parent
fails to respond within twenty-one days, the parenting time rights of such
parent shall be suspended until further order of the court. If such parent
responds and objects, a hearing shall be held within thirty-five days of such
response. The court may determine that any offending parent who responds and
objects shall be responsible for the costs associated with any hearing,
including reasonable attorney fees incurred by the other parent. In making such
determination, the court shall consider the criminal record of the offending
parent and any actions to harass the other parent and the children, any
mitigating actions by the offending parent, and whether the actions of either
parent have been substantially frivolous, substantially groundless, or
substantially vexatious. The offending parent shall have the burden at the
hearing to prove that parenting time by such parent is in the best interests of
the child or children.
(b)
The
provisions of paragraph (a) of this subsection (3) shall apply to the following
crimes:
(I)
Murder in the first degree, as defined in section 18-3-102, C.R.S.;
(II)
Murder in the second degree, as defined in section 18-3-103, C.R.S.;
(III)
Enticement of a child, as defined in section 18-3-305, C.R.S.;
(IV)
(A)
Sexual assault, as described in section 18-3-402, C.R.S.; and
(B)
Sexual assault in the first degree, as described in section 18-3-402, C.R.S., as
it existed prior to July 1, 2000;
(V)
Sexual assault in the second degree, as described in section 18-3-403, C.R.S.,
as it existed prior to July 1, 2000;
(VI)
(A)
Unlawful sexual contact if the victim is compelled to submit, as described in
section 18-3-404 (2), C.R.S.; and
(B)
Sexual assault in the third degree if the victim is compelled to submit, as
described in section 18-3-404 (2), C.R.S., as it existed prior to July 1, 2000;
(VII)
Sexual
assault on a child, as defined in section 18-3-405, C.R.S.;
(VIII) Incest,
as described in section 18-6-301, C.R.S.;
(IX)
Aggravated
incest, as described in section 18-6-302, C.R.S.;
(X)
Child
abuse, as described in section 18-6-401 (7)(a)(I) to (7)(a)(IV), C.R.S.;
(XI)
Human trafficking of a minor for sexual servitude, as described in section
18-3-504 (2), C.R.S.;
(XII)
Sexual
exploitation of children, as defined in section 18-6-403, C.R.S.;
(XIII) Procurement
of a child for sexual exploitation, as defined in section 18-6-404, C.R.S.;
(XIV) Soliciting
for child prostitution, as defined in section 18-7-402, C.R.S.;
(XV)
Pandering of a child, as defined in section 18-7-403, C.R.S.;
(XVI) Procurement
of a child, as defined in section 18-7-403.5, C.R.S.;
(XVII) Keeping
a place of child prostitution, as defined in section 18-7-404, C.R.S.;
(XVIII) Pimping
of a child, as defined in section 18-7-405, C.R.S.;
(XIX)
Inducement of child prostitution, as defined in section 18-7-405.5, C.R.S.;
(XX)
Patronizing a prostituted child, as defined in section 18-7-406, C.R.S.
(c)
If
the party was convicted in another state or jurisdiction of an offense that, if
committed in Colorado, would constitute an offense listed in subparagraphs (III)
to (XX) of paragraph (b) of this subsection (3), the court shall order that
party to submit to a sex-offense-specific evaluation and a parental risk
assessment in Colorado and the court shall consider the recommendations of the
evaluation and the assessment in any order the court makes relating to parenting
time or parental contact. The convicted party shall pay for the costs of the
evaluation and the assessment.
(4) A
motion to restrict parenting time or parental contact with a parent which
alleges that the child is in imminent physical or emotional danger due to the
parenting time or contact by the parent shall be heard and ruled upon by the
court not later than fourteen days after the day of the filing of the motion.
Any parenting time which occurs during such fourteen-day period after the filing
of such a motion shall be supervised by an unrelated third party deemed suitable
by the court or by a licensed mental health professional, as defined in section
14-10-127 (1)(b). This subsection (4) shall not apply to any motion which is
filed pursuant to subsection (3) of this section.
(5)
If
the court finds that the filing of a motion under subsection (4) of this section
was substantially frivolous, substantially groundless, or substantially
vexatious, the court shall require the moving party to pay the reasonable and
necessary attorney fees and costs of the other party.
|