Maine Relocation Statutes

Please check state case law as standards for relocation may be
found in case law.
19-A M.R.S.
§
1653. Parental rights and responsibilities
1.
Legislative findings and purpose.
The Legislature
makes the following findings concerning relationships among family members in
determining what is in the best interest of children.
A.
The Legislature
finds and declares as public policy that encouraging mediated resolutions of
disputes between parents is in the best interest of minor children.
B.
The Legislature
finds that domestic abuse is a serious crime against the individual and society,
producing an unhealthy and dangerous family environment, resulting in a pattern
of escalating abuse, including violence, that frequently culminates in
intrafamily homicide and creating an atmosphere that is not conducive to healthy
childhood development.
C.
The Legislature
finds and declares that, except when a court determines that the best interest
of a child would not be served, it is the public policy of this State to assure
minor children of frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the
parents have separated or dissolved their marriage and to encourage parents to
share the rights and responsibilities of child rearing in order to effect this
policy.
2.
Parental rights and responsibilities; order.
This subsection
governs parental rights and responsibilities and court orders for parental
rights and responsibilities.
A.
When the parents
have agreed to an award of shared parental rights and responsibilities or so
agree in open court, the court shall make that award unless there is substantial
evidence that it should not be ordered. The court shall state in its decision
the reasons for not ordering a shared parental rights and responsibilities award
agreed to by the parents.
B.
The court may
award reasonable rights of contact with a minor child to a 3rd person.
C.
The court may
award parental rights and responsibilities with respect to the child to a 3rd
person, a suitable society or institution for the care and protection of
children or the department, upon a finding that awarding parental rights and
responsibilities to either or both parents will place the child in jeopardy as
defined in Title 22, section 4002, subsection 6.
D.
The order of the
court awarding parental rights and responsibilities must include the following:
(1)
Allocated
parental rights and responsibilities, shared parental rights and
responsibilities or sole parental rights and responsibilities, according to the
best interest of the child as provided in subsection 3. An award of shared
parental rights and responsibilities may include either an allocation of the
child’s primary residential care to one parent and rights of parent-child
contact to the other parent, or a sharing of the child’s primary residential
care by both parents. If either or both parents request an award of shared
primary residential care and the court does not award shared primary residential
care of the child, the court shall state in its decision the reasons why shared
primary residential care is not in the best interest of the child;
(2)
Conditions of
parent-child contact in cases involving domestic abuse as provided in subsection
6;
(3)
A provision for
child support as provided in subsection 8 or a statement of the reasons for not
ordering child support;
(4)
A statement that
each parent must have access to records and information pertaining to a minor
child, including, but not limited to, medical, dental and school records and
other information on school activities, whether or not the child resides with
the parent, unless that access is found not to be in the best interest of the
child or that access is found to be sought for the purpose of causing detriment
to the other parent. If that access is not ordered, the court shall state in the
order its reasons for denying that access;
(5)
A statement that
violation of the order may result in a finding of contempt and imposition of
sanctions as provided in subsection 7; and
(6)
A statement of
the definition of shared parental rights and responsibilities contained in
section 1501, subsection 5, if the order of the court awards shared parental
rights and responsibilities.
An order
modifying a previous order is not required to include provisions of the previous
order that are not modified.
E.
The order of the
court may not include a requirement that the State pay for the defendant to
attend a batterers’ intervention program unless the program is certified under
section 4014.
3.
Best interest of child.
The court, in
making an award of parental rights and responsibilities with respect to a child,
shall apply the standard of the best interest of the child. In making decisions
regarding the child’s residence and parent-child contact, the court shall
consider as primary the safety and well-being of the child. In applying this
standard, the court shall consider the following factors:
A.
The age of the
child;
B.
The relationship
of the child with the child’s parents and any other persons who may
significantly affect the child’s welfare;
C.
The preference of
the child, if old enough to express a meaningful preference;
D.
The duration and
adequacy of the child’s current living arrangements and the desirability of
maintaining continuity;
E.
The stability of
any proposed living arrangements for the child;
F.
The motivation of
the parties involved and their capacities to give the child love, affection and
guidance;
G.
The child’s
adjustment to the child’s present home, school and community;
H.
The capacity of
each parent to allow and encourage frequent and continuing contact between the
child and the other parent, including physical access;
I.
The capacity of
each parent to cooperate or to learn to cooperate in child care;
J.
Methods for
assisting parental cooperation and resolving disputes and each parent’s
willingness to use those methods;
K.
The effect on the
child if one parent has sole authority over the child’s upbringing;
L.
The existence of
domestic abuse between the parents, in the past or currently, and how that abuse
affects:
(1)
The child
emotionally;
(2)
The safety of the
child; and
(3)
The other factors
listed in this subsection, which must be considered in light of the presence of
past or current domestic abuse;
M.
The existence of
any history of child abuse by a parent;
N.
All other factors
having a reasonable bearing on the physical and psychological well-being of the
child;
O.
A parent’s prior
willful misuse of the protection from abuse process in chapter 101 in order to
gain tactical advantage in a proceeding involving the determination of parental
rights and responsibilities of a minor child. Such willful misuse may only be
considered if established by clear and convincing evidence, and if it is further
found by clear and convincing evidence that in the particular circumstances of
the parents and child, that willful misuse tends to show that the acting parent
will in the future have a lessened ability and willingness to cooperate and work
with the other parent in their shared responsibilities for the child. The court
shall articulate findings of fact whenever relying upon this factor as part of
its determination of a child’s best interest. The voluntary dismissal of a
protection from abuse petition may not, taken alone, be treated as evidence of
the willful misuse of the protection from abuse process;
P.
If the child is
under one year of age, whether the child is being breast-fed;
Q.
The existence of
a parent’s conviction for a sex offense or a sexually violent offense as those
terms are defined in Title 34-A, section 11203;
R.
If there is a
person residing with a parent, whether that person:
(1)
Has been
convicted of a crime under Title 17-A, chapter 11 or 12 or a comparable crime in
another jurisdiction;
(2)
Has been
adjudicated of a juvenile offense that, if the person had been an adult at the
time of the offense, would have been a violation of Title 17-A, chapter 11 or
12; or
(3)
Has been
adjudicated in a proceeding, in which the person was a party, under Title 22,
chapter 1071 as having committed a sexual offense; and
S.
Whether
allocation of some or all parental rights and responsibilities would best
support the child’s safety and well-being.
4. Equal consideration of parents.
The court may not
apply a preference for one parent over the other in determining parental rights
and responsibilities because of the parent’s gender or the child’s age or
gender.
5. Departure from family residence.
The court may not
consider departure from the family residence as a factor in determining parental
rights and responsibilities with respect to a minor child when the departing
parent has been physically harmed or seriously threatened with physical harm by
the other parent and that harm or threat of harm was causally related to the
departure, or when one parent has left the family residence by mutual agreement
or at the request or insistence of the other parent.
5-A. Effect of protective order.
Although the
court shall consider the fact that a protective order was issued under chapter
101, the court shall determine the proper award of parental rights and
responsibilities and award of rights of contact de novo and may not use as
precedent the award of parental rights and responsibilities and rights of
contact included in the protective order.
6. Conditions of parent-child
contact in cases involving domestic abuse.
The court shall
establish conditions of parent-child contact in cases involving domestic abuse
as follows.
A.
A court may award
primary residence of a minor child or parent-child contact with a minor child to
a parent who has committed domestic abuse only if the court finds that contact
between the parent and child is in the best interest of the child and that
adequate provision for the safety of the child and the parent who is a victim of
domestic abuse can be made.
B.
In an order of
parental rights and responsibilities, a court may:
(1)
Order an exchange
of a child to occur in a protected setting;
(2)
Order contact to
be supervised by another person or agency;
(3)
Order the parent
who has committed domestic abuse to attend and complete to the satisfaction of
the court a domestic abuse intervention program or other designated counseling
as a condition of the contact;
(4)
Order either
parent to abstain from possession or consumption of alcohol or controlled
substances, or both, during the visitation and for 24 hours preceding the
contact;
(5)
Order the parent
who has committed domestic abuse to pay a fee to defray the costs of supervised
contact;
(6)
Prohibit
overnight parent-child contact; and
(7)
Impose any other
condition that is determined necessary to provide for the safety of the child,
the victim of domestic abuse or any other family or household member.
C.
The court may
require security from the parent who has committed domestic abuse for the return
and safety of the child.
D.
The court may
order the address of the child and the victim to be kept confidential.
E.
The court may not
order a victim of domestic abuse to attend counseling with the parent who has
committed domestic abuse.
F.
If a court allows
a family or household member to supervise parent-child contact, the court shall
establish conditions to be followed during that contact. Conditions include but
are not limited to:
(1)
Minimizing
circumstances when the family of the parent who has committed domestic abuse
would be supervising visits;
(2)
Ensuring that
contact does not damage the relationship with the parent with whom the child has
primary physical residence;
(3)
Ensuring the
safety and well-being of the child; and
(4)
Requiring that
supervision is provided by a person who is physically and mentally capable of
supervising a visit and who does not have a criminal history or history of abuse
or neglect.
G.
Fees set forth in
this subsection incurred by the parent who has committed domestic abuse may not
be considered as a mitigating factor reducing that parent’s child support
obligation.
6-A. Custody and contact limited;
convictions for sexual offenses.
The award of
primary residence and parent-child contact with a person who has been convicted
of a child-related sexual offense is governed by this subsection.
A.
For the purposes
of this section, “child-related sexual offense” means the following sexual
offenses if, at the time of the commission of the offense, the victim was under
18 years of age:
(1)
Sexual
exploitation of a minor, under Title 17-A, section 282;
(2)
Gross sexual
assault, under Title 17-A, section 253;
(3)
Sexual abuse of a
minor, under Title 17-A, section 254;
(4)
Unlawful sexual
contact, under Title 17-A, section 255-A or former section 255;
(5)
Visual sexual
aggression against a child, under Title 17-A, section 256;
(6)
Sexual misconduct
with a child under 14 years of age, under Title 17-A, section 258;
(6-A)
Solicitation of a child to commit a prohibited act, under Title 17-A, section
259-A; or
(7)
An offense in
another jurisdiction that involves conduct that is substantially similar to that
contained in subparagraph (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) or (6-A). For purposes of
this subparagraph, “another jurisdiction” means the Federal Government, the
United States military, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin
Islands, Guam, American Samoa and each of the several states except Maine.
“Another jurisdiction” also means the Passamaquoddy Tribe when that tribe has
acted pursuant to Title 30, section 6209-A, subsection 1, paragraph A or B and
the Penobscot Nation when that tribe has acted pursuant to Title 30, section
6209-B, subsection 1, paragraph A or B.
B.
A court may award
primary residence of a minor child or parent-child contact with a minor child to
a parent who has been convicted of a child-related sexual offense only if the
court finds that contact between the parent and child is in the best interest of
the child and that adequate provision for the safety of the child can be made.
C.
In an order of
parental rights and responsibilities, a court may require that parent-child
contact between a minor child and a person convicted of a child-related sexual
offense may occur only if there is another person or agency present to supervise
the contact. If the court allows a family or household member to supervise
parent-child contact, the court shall establish conditions to be followed during
that contact. Conditions include, but are not limited to, those that:
(1)
Minimize
circumstances when the family of the parent who is a sex offender or sexually
violent predator would be supervising visits;
(2)
Ensure that
contact does not damage the relationship with the parent with whom the child has
primary physical residence;
(3)
Ensure the safety
and well-being of the child; and
(4)
Require that
supervision be provided by a person who is physically and mentally capable of
supervising a visit and who does not have a criminal history or history of abuse
or neglect.
6-B. Conviction or adjudication
for certain sex offenses; presumption.
There is a
rebuttable presumption that the petitioner would create a situation of jeopardy
for the child if any contact were to be permitted and that any contact is not in
the best interests of the child if the court finds that the person seeking
primary residence or contact with the child:
A.
Has been
convicted of an offense listed in subsection 6-A, paragraph A in which the
victim was a minor at the time of the offense and the person was at least 5
years older than the minor at the time of the offense except that, if the
offense was gross sexual assault under Title 17-A, section 253, subsection 1,
paragraph B or C, or an offense in another jurisdiction that involves conduct
that is substantially similar to that contained in Title 17-A, section 253,
subsection 1, paragraph B or C, and the minor victim submitted as a result of
compulsion, the presumption applies regardless of the ages of the person and the
minor victim at the time of the offense; or
B.
Has been
adjudicated in an action under Title 22, chapter 1071 of sexually abusing a
person who was a minor at the time of the abuse.
The person
seeking primary residence or contact with the child may present evidence to
rebut the presumption.
7. Violation of order concerning
parental rights and responsibilities and contact.
Either parent may
petition the court for a hearing on the issue of noncompliance with the order
issued under subsection 2. If the court finds that a parent has violated a part
of the order, the court may find that parent in contempt and may:
A.
Require
additional or more specific terms and conditions consistent with the order;
B.
Order that
additional visitation be provided for a parent to take the place of visitation
that was wrongfully denied; or
C.
Order a parent
found in contempt to pay a forfeiture of at least $ 100.
8. Child support order.
The court may
order conditions of child support as follows.
A.
Either parent of
a minor child shall contribute reasonable and just sums as child support payable
weekly, biweekly, monthly or quarterly. In an action filed under section 1654,
the court may require the child’s nonprimary care provider to pay past support.
Availability of public welfare benefits to the family may not affect the
decision of the court as to the responsibility of a parent to provide child
support. The court shall inquire of the parties concerning the existence of a
child support order entered pursuant to chapter 65, subchapter 2, article 3. If
an order exists, the court shall consider its terms in establishing a child
support obligation. A determination or modification of child support under this
section and a determination of past support must comply with chapter 63.
B.
After January 1,
1990, if the court orders either parent to provide child support, the court
order must require that the child support be provided beyond the child’s 18th
birthday if the child is attending secondary school as defined in Title 20-A,
section 1, until the child graduates, withdraws or is expelled from secondary
school or attains the age of 19, whichever occurs first.
C.
The court may
require the payment of part or all of the medical expenses, hospital expenses
and other health care expenses of the child. The court order must include a
provision requiring at least one parent to obtain and maintain private health
insurance for the child, if private health insurance for the child is available
at reasonable cost. The court order must also require the parent providing
insurance to furnish proof of coverage to the other parent within 15 days of
receipt of a copy of the court order. If private health insurance for the child
is not available at reasonable cost at the time of the hearing, the court order
must include a provision requiring at least one parent to obtain and maintain
private health insurance for the child that must be effective immediately upon
private health insurance for the child being available at reasonable cost.
When the
department provides support enforcement services, the support order must include
a provision that requires the responsible parent to keep the department informed
of changes in that parent’s current address, the name and address of that
parent’s current employer and whether the responsible parent has access to
reasonable cost health insurance coverage and, if so, the health insurance
policy information and any subsequent changes.
9. Enforcement of child support
order.
The court may
enforce a child support order as provided in chapter 65.
10. Modification or termination.
Upon the petition
of one or both of the parents, an order for parental rights and responsibilities
with respect to a minor child may be modified or terminated as circumstances
require.
A.
Modification and
termination of child support orders are governed by section 2009.
B.
Modification of
and termination orders for parental rights and responsibilities other than child
support are governed by section 1657.
11. Mediation.
Prior to a
contested hearing under this chapter relating to initial or modified orders, the
court shall refer the parties to mediation as provided in chapter 3.
12. Termination of order.
A court order
requiring the payment of child support remains in force as to each child until
the order is altered by the court or until that child:
A.
Attains 18 years
of age. For orders issued after January 1, 1990, if the child attains 18 years
of age while attending secondary school as defined in Title 20-A, section 1, the
order remains in force until the child graduates, withdraws or is expelled from
secondary school or attains 19 years of age, whichever occurs first;
B.
Becomes married;
or
C.
Becomes a member
of the armed services.
13. Automatic adjustments.
The order of the
court or hearing officer may include automatic adjustments to the amount of
money paid for the support of a child when the child attains 12 or 18 years of
age; or when the child graduates, withdraws or is expelled from secondary
school, attains 19 years of age or is otherwise emancipated, whichever occurs
first.
14. Notice of relocation.
The order must
require notice of the intended relocation of a child by a parent awarded shared
parental rights and responsibilities or allocated parental rights and
responsibilities. At least 30 days before the intended relocation of a child by
a parent, the parent shall provide notice to the other parent of the intended
relocation. If the relocation must occur in fewer than 30 days, the parent who
is relocating shall provide notice as soon as possible to the other parent. If
the parent who is relocating believes notifying the other parent will cause
danger to the relocating parent or the child, the relocating parent shall notify
the court of the intended relocation, and the court shall provide appropriate
notice to the other parent in a manner determined to provide safety to the
relocating parent and child.
§ 1657. Modification or termination of orders for parental rights and
responsibilities
1. Modification or termination.
An order for
parental rights and responsibilities may be modified or terminated as
circumstances require:
A.
Upon the petition
of one or both of the parents; or
B.
Upon the motion
of an agency or person who has been granted parental rights and responsibilities
or contact with a child under this chapter.
2. Change in circumstances.
In reviewing a
motion for modification or termination filed under chapter 59 or section 1653 or
1655, the following constitute a substantial change in circumstances:
A.
The relocation,
or intended relocation, of a child resident in this state to another state by a
parent, when the other parent is a resident of this State and there exists an
award of shared or allocated parental rights and responsibilities concerning the
child;
A-1.
The relocation,
or intended relocation, of a child that will disrupt the parent-child contact
between the child and the parent who is not relocating, if there exists an award
of shared or allocated parental rights and responsibilities concerning the
child. Relocating the child more than 60 miles from the residence of the parent
who is relocating or more than 60 miles from the residence of the parent who is
not relocating is presumed to disrupt the parent-child contact between the child
and the parent who is not relocating;
A-2.
The receipt of
notice of the intended relocation of the child as required under section 1653,
subsection 14; or
B.
A finding by the
court that domestic or family violence has occurred since the last determination
of primary residence.
3.
Uniform child custody jurisdiction and enforcement act.
The jurisdiction
granted by this section to make or alter an order concerning parental rights and
responsibilities with respect to a minor child is limited by the Uniform Child
Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, if another state may have jurisdiction
as provided in that Act.
|